LGEAN Webinars
- Defending our Water Infrastructure: Creating a Cybersecurity Culture in Small Community Water and Wastewater Systems
- Youth Climate Action How Local Governments Can Learn from Generation Z
- Equity-Centered Local Climate Action Planning
- Toxics in the Community: Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) for Local and Tribal Governments
- Defending our Water Infrastructure: Creating a Cybersecurity Culture in Small Community Water and Wastewater Systems
- Small Community Drinking Water Systems Financing Workshop
- Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule 101 for Local and Tribal Governments
- Clean Air Act Regulations for Natural Disaster Management
Defending our Water Infrastructure: Creating a Cybersecurity Culture in Small Community Water and Wastewater Systems
Date: January 24
Time: 12:00-1:30PM
This webinar convenes the three major federal agencies that play a role in addressing cybersecurity in the water and wastewater sector. Panelists from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation will discuss cybersecurity threats to the sector, provide advice on how to prevent and respond to cyberattacks, and share tips and resources for small community water systems to create a robust cybersecurity culture. Cyberattacks on our public drinking water systems are occurring with greater frequency. Recent examples include a hacker altering chemical levels at a Florida water system in 2021, as well as the SolarWinds network breach in 2020, which gave cybercriminals access to 73 water systems. In 2021, EPA estimated water and wastewater utilities to be at risk of at least one cyberattack per year on both Business Enterprise and Process Control Systems. Malevolent actors encompass terrorists, hackers, and even disgruntled former employees who put the public health at risk from loss of service and unsafe drinking water. The America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018 (AWIA) recognizes these and similar risks by requiring every water system serving more than 3,300 people to prepare and regularly update a Risk and Resilience Assessment (RRA) and Emergency Response Plan (ERP). But 1,000, or over 11%, of small water systems serving 7.2 million people, still failed to certify their ERPs by mid-2021, six months after the deadline. Small community water systems in particular face great challenges in preparing and implementing cybersecurity strategies due to limited resources, technical knowledge, and funding.
Additional Resources:
Presentation Slides and FAQ
Panelists:
Cynthia R. Harris, Deputy Director, Center for State, Tribal, and Local Environmental Programs, Environmental Law Institute, Moderator
Brandon M. Carter, Sr. Cybersecurity Specialist, Water Infrastructure and Cyber Resilience Division (WICRD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Benjamin Gilbert, Cybersecurity Advisor, CISA Region 3, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
Vijal Pancholi, Cybersecurity Specialist, Water Infrastructure and Cyber Resilience Division (WICRD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Aaron Steps, Supervisory Special Agent, Cyber Division, U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Youth Climate Action How Local Governments Can Learn from Generation Z
Young people are leading the fight against climate change both in the United States and around the world. Thirty-two percent of Gen Zers— more than any other generation—have taken concrete actions to address climate change in the last year. These youth are leading campaigns against fossil fuel companies and are bringing constitutional challenges in court against their state and federal governments, as in Juliana v. U.S. and Held v. Montana. Many of these young people are thinking globally and acting locally, serving on municipal climate commissions, helping their school districts shift to renewables, and demanding that City Hall recognize the climate emergency. Local governments and officials can work in tandem with young leaders in their community to advance climate action. While young people have the knowledge and fervor required to raise awareness, local governments can provide resources and have the power to enact change through ordinances, policies, programs, and infrastructure development. Join the Local Government Environmental Assistance Network (LGEAN) and the Environmental Law Institute to hear from a panel of youth climate leaders as they share insights with municipalities about how to engage youth in climate action and their climate action priorities. The panel will provide advice to other inspiring young leaders and suggestions for local governments on how to work with youth activists to foster joint action that brings about meaningful and long-lasting change.
Panelists:
Linda Breggin, Director of the Center for State, Tribal, and Local Environmental Programs, Environmental Law Institute, Moderator
Oscar Fox, Representative, City of Nashville - Mayor's Youth Council
Brendan Hyatt, Research Fellow for Human Trafficking Search
Keala Minna-Choe, Youth v. Oil Intern, Youth4Climate
Lily Morse, Executive Director, Green Schools Campaign
Equity-Centered Local Climate Action Planning
Cities, towns, and metroregions across the United States and around the globe are developing or updating climate action plans. In recent years, the focus has shifted among mitigation, adaptation, and sustainability goals. But best practices now integrate equity: recognizing that frontline populations, including historically marginalized communities, often experience the worst impacts from climate change impacts while also not sharing in the benefits from transitioning to a low-carbon economy. These populations include Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), the elderly, children, physically and mentally disabled individuals, people experiencing homelessness, pregnant women, and immigrants. Local leaders are increasingly aware that many disparate impacts of climate change reflect the results of systemic discrimination, and they are exploring methods of integrating equity into climate planning while also taking advantage of opportunities to simultaneously address these longstanding disparities. This panel of experts discussed best practices in taking an equity-centered approach to local climate action planning, from meaningful and inclusive stakeholder engagement at the earliest stages through prioritizing bold yet achievable strategies, to implementation and ensuring accountability to all impacted communities.
Panelists:
Cynthia R. Harris, Deputy Director of the Center for State, Tribal, and Local Environmental Programs, Environmental Law Institute, Moderator
Darbi Berry, Director of Climate and Environmental Programs, San Diego Regional Climate Collaborative
Matt Gray, Former Chief of Sustainability, City of Cleveland, Ohio; Current Senior VP of Program, Student Conservation Association
Jennifer Li, Staff Attorney and Adjunct Professor, Harrison Institute for Public Law, Georgetown University Law Center
Luis Martinez, Youth for Environmental Justice Alumni and Climate Adaptation and Resilience Enhancement (CARE) Lead Intern, Communities for a Better Environment
Toxics in the Community: Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) for Local and Tribal Governments
The Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) created the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) to inform the public about potentially hazardous materials in their communities. In fact, two out of every three Americans live within three miles of facilities subject to the TRI, which covers over 800 individual chemicals and chemical categories. These substances often originate from manufacturing, mining, and hazardous waste management sites and are known to cause significant adverse harm to the environment and human health. Local governments use TRI data in many ways, from supporting emergency planning to informing siting and permitting decisions and aiding “fence-line” communities at risk of potential exposure. Local and tribal government owned- and operated facilities, such as waste management and locally owned utilities, may also be subject to TRI reporting requirements, and governments officials need to be informed about their obligations. Join the Local Government Environmental Assistance Network (LGEAN), the Environmental Law Institute (ELI), and EPA to learn more about how local and tribal governments can best use the TRI to help protect community members’ health and welfare. EPA experts will provide an overview of the TRI, explaining which local and tribal government facilities may be subject to reporting requirements and how officials can use the TRI and other EPA tools to respond to community concerns and trace chemical releases back to their sources.
Panelists:
Cynthia R. Harris, Deputy Director of the Center for State, Tribal, and Local Environmental Programs, Environmental Law Institute, Moderator
Caitlin Briere, Senior Analyst, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Environmental Protection Agency
Sarah Swenson, Communications Specialist, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Environmental Protection Agency
Steve Witkin, Specialist – TRI Explorer, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Environmental Protection Agency
Defending our Water Infrastructure: Creating a Cybersecurity Culture in Small Community Water and Wastewater Systems
This webinar convenes the three major federal agencies that play a role in addressing cybersecurity in the water and wastewater sector. Panelists from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation will discuss cybersecurity threats to the sector, provide advice on how to prevent and respond to cyberattacks, and share tips and resources for small community water systems to create a robust cybersecurity culture. Cyberattacks on our public drinking water systems are occurring with greater frequency. Recent examples include a hacker altering chemical levels at a Florida water system in 2021, as well as the SolarWinds network breach in 2020, which gave cybercriminals access to 73 water systems. In 2021, EPA estimated water and wastewater utilities to be at risk of at least one cyberattack per year on both Business Enterprise and Process Control Systems. Malevolent actors encompass terrorists, hackers, and even disgruntled former employees who put the public health at risk from loss of service and unsafe drinking water. The America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018 (AWIA) recognizes these and similar risks by requiring every water system serving more than 3,300 people to prepare and regularly update a Risk and Resilience Assessment (RRA) and Emergency Response Plan (ERP). But 1,000, or over 11%, of small water systems serving 7.2 million people, still failed to certify their ERPs by mid-2021, six months after the deadline. Small community water systems in particular face great challenges in preparing and implementing cybersecurity strategies due to limited resources, technical knowledge, and funding.
Additional Resources:
Defending our Water Infrastructure
Panelists:
Cynthia R. Harris, Deputy Director, Center for State, Tribal, and Local Environmental Programs, Environmental Law Institute, Moderator
Brandon M. Carter, Sr. Cybersecurity Specialist, Water Infrastructure and Cyber Resilience Division (WICRD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Benjamin Gilbert, Cybersecurity Advisor, CISA Region 3, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
Vijal Pancholi, Cybersecurity Specialist, Water Infrastructure and Cyber Resilience Division (WICRD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Aaron Steps, Supervisory Special Agent, Cyber Division, U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Small Community Drinking Water Systems Financing Workshop
Operators of the close to 50,000 community water systems across the U.S. are dedicated to ensuring nearly 312 million Americans have access to clean and safe drinking water. But maintaining compliance with stringent drinking water standards requires costly infrastructure investments, often a challenge especially for the small and very community water systems that make up approximately 80 percent of community water systems. In 2020, nearly 1,800 of the United States’ small and very small community drinking water systems were found to be in significant noncompliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act. This LGEAN & ELI co-sponsored workshop provides local officials, water utility managers and other decision-makers with innovative approaches to planning, funding and financing, specifically for small water systems. In the first module of this session, experts from the Environmental Protection Agency discuss approaches to funding and finance that facilitate compliance and management to protect the environment and public health. This module provides participants with information on planning and use of new and existing federal funding sources – covering options from state revolving funds to the American Rescue Plan Act. In the second module, specialists from the Environmental Finance Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill demonstrate how local communities can use asset management and capital planning, rate setting and other strategies and tools to achieve sustainable financing. EPA experts also provide a live demonstration of their Water Finance Clearing House, an online, interactive database with water financing resources including funding opportunities and guidance documents.
Panelists:
Cassandra Rice, Attorney Advisor, Office of Enforcement Compliance Assurance, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Tara Johnson, Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Wastewater Management, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Alison Flenniken, Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Elsemarie Mullins, Project Director, Environmental Finance Center, University of North Carolina
Stephen Lapp, Project Director, Environmental Finance Center, University of North Carolina
Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule 101 for Local and Tribal Governments
While oil discharges often elicit memories of the Deepwater Horizon oilrig explosion and oil tankers like the Exxon Valdez running aground, many oil discharges in fact originate with non-transportation, onshore facilities. These onshore non-transportation related facilities include but are not limited to, oil storage terminals, bulk plants, refineries oil production/exploration operations and facilities that are end users of oil. This includes facilities owned and operated by local and tribal governments. Oil discharges can originate with any facility where oil is stored, such as tribal or local government fueling areas for motor pools, police and fire stations, water treatment plants, sewage treatment plants, road maintenance facilities, sewer pump stations, and emergency generators. The Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule, promulgated under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act or Clean Water Act (CWA), aims to prevent oil discharges from reaching navigable waters or adjoining shorelines. The SPCC Rule requires facilities that reach certain threshold storage requirements to develop and implement SPCC plans, among meeting other obligations. By complying with the SPCC Rule, local and tribal governments can help avoid oil discharges that can ultimately harm inland and coastal waters. Local and tribal environmental agencies are also key to monitoring private facilities for SPCC noncompliance in order to prevent the devastating consequences an oil discharge can have for both natural resources and affected communities.
Additional Resources:
https://www.epa.gov/oil-spills-prevention-and-preparedness-regulations
Panelists:
Cynthia R. Harris, Deputy Director, Center for State, Tribal, and Local Environmental Programs, Environmental Law Institute, Moderator
Mark Howard, Oil Spill Prevention Program Manager and Senior SPCC Advisor, U.S. EPA
Kelly Brantner, Attorney, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, U.S. EPA
John Kosco, Environmental Engineer, Office of Compliance, Water Branch, U.S. EPA
Clean Air Act Regulations for Natural Disaster Management
Natural disasters can have catastrophic impacts on community air quality, even after the initial event has passed. Destruction from hurricanes, earthquakes, and wildfires can release massive quantities of air pollutants, including particulate matter. Recent major blazes in California spurred serious concerns about asbestos and other toxins released by the wildfires. 2017’s Hurricane Harvey triggered the release of an estimated 5.7 million pounds of hazardous chemicals, including benzene and volatile organic compounds. Critically, local and tribal governments themselves may be the source of contaminants, such as through the use of incinerators to clean up debris.
Join our panel of experts from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as they guide local and tribal governments on federal requirements that may be triggered during post-disaster recovery. Panelists will discuss compliance obligations focused on managing asbestos, use of emergency engines, and destruction of disaster debris through incineration, and share other resources to guide post-disaster recovery.
Additional Resources:
https://www.eli.org/sites/default/files/files-pdf/LGEAN_Disaster%20Debris_01_12_2021.pdf
Panelists:
Cynthia R. Harris, Director, Tribal Programs; Deputy Director, Center for State, Tribal, and Local Environmental Programming; and Staff Attorney, Environmental Law Institute, Moderator
Sara Ayres, Mechanical Engineer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, Office of Compliance
John Cox, Physical Scientist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, Office of Compliance
Marcia Mia, Chemical Engineer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, Office of Compliance